Material from, or relating to, the British Medical Journal [BMJ]

“Questioning the Journal’s independence and lack of scientific explanation in the College’s response”

In the latest BMJ a joint investigation by theĀ  BMJ and BBC Newsnight is reported. It concerns me that “strategic communications” outrank editorial independence and scientific decision making:

“80% might be false positive”

A recent BMJ Editorial outlines concerns relating to The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation that all adults in general practice be screened for major depressive disorder and … Continue reading “80% might be false positive”

“The hyperbole in the media and scientific response is unjustified and cruel to patients”

The following serious concerns, as reported in the BMJ, 22 July 2023, hardly seemed to appear in the worldwide trailblazing headlines of the latest anti-amyloid drug. I wonder why?

A response by Dr Peter J Gordon

I have submitted this response, on the above paper, to the BMJ: Dear Editor, I would like to add my support to the proposal put forward by Davies et al … Continue reading A response by Dr Peter J Gordon

Withdrawing from antidepressants: advice for primary care

Withdrawing from antidepressants: advice for primary care was published in British Journal of General Practice in March 2023. The authors: Emilia G Palmer, Sangeetha Sornalingam, Lisa Page and Maxwell Cooper … Continue reading Withdrawing from antidepressants: advice for primary care

“Promulgating therapeutic recommendations”

The following letter, written by Dr Philip Cowen and Dr Chris Thompson, was published in the BMJ in October 1994 [this, as it happens, being mid-way through the ‘Defeat Depression … Continue reading “Promulgating therapeutic recommendations”