“Real science”, the Academic argued, should be “based on what is considered credible.”
The Academic continued: “This is is one of the ‘Rules of Science’ and is necessary if we are to quantify understanding.”
On hearing of this “science” the philosopher felt a need to quietly say:
“Numbers are symbols, as are letters: both are necessary in developing wider understanding, but neither are sufficient nor able [alone or combined] to translate experience in its entirety.”
When considering the science of the Mind, we must remember that much of what is claimed to be ‘objective’,
that which you determine as ‘real science’, is actually based on a symbolic reduction of subjective experience”